Citing Sources
In my most recent post introducing my on-going series on the 2012
elections, I went on at some length about “doing one's homework.” I hold myself to that same standard‒with
at least some consistency, I hope. A reader might have noticed that I
cite my sources in many, if not most, of my posts and thought I
should give a brief account of my thinking regarding citation styles.
As an undergraduate I took upper-level classes from many different
disciplines: physics, engineering, geology, biology, and political
science...to name a few. The default citation format I cut my teeth on was the
venerable Modern Language Association
(MLA) style. This makes sense when one considers that most
undergrad's are introduced to writing “scholarly” papers not
within their own major, but in courses taught by faculty from the
English department.
One of the things I like about the MLA style is
that it is set up to handle a very wide range of sources, from
peer-reviewed journals to on-line videos of scientific symposia and
just about everything in-between. Like many students, I used a
bibliographic citation software package, specifically, EndNote.
However, EndNote is very expensive and I was delighted when I learned
of Zotero, a free, open-source
alternative to EndNote and its pricey competitors.
For a professor grading a stack of papers
written by undergrads, the MLA style is nearly ideal because the
in-text citations are obvious (or very "in-your-face," depending on one's mood) and are easy to reconcile with the list
of “works cited” at the end of the paper. I get that. Though I am
no longer a student, I still want to show that I have done my
homework in what I write, but the very thing that makes MLA great for
professors grading papers, the obviousness of the in-text citations,
makes a MLA formatted paper hard to read if the writer actually wants
someone that is not an English professor to read it because the
effect is visually quite jarring.
After some playing around with the Citation
Style Language (CSL) used by Zotero, I have found that I really
like the in-text citation format used by the British journal Nature.
It consists of a simple, unobtrusive, superscript within the text
which corresponds to the entry in the references at the end of the
paper. However, the Nature
style is not set up to handle nearly the same diversity of sources
that MLA is, so I have had to tweak it a bit to make it work. It is
still very much a work in progress and so if a reader cannot easily
place the citation style I use, now they know why.
Comments